Sentencing Snapshot no. 220 describes sentencing outcomes for the offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs in the County and Supreme Courts of Victoria from 2012–13 to 2016–17.
This is the most recent Sentencing Snapshot for this offence.
You can also find statistics for this offence on SACStat.
Authored and published by the Sentencing Advisory Council
© State of Victoria, Sentencing Advisory Council, 2018
Snapshot 220: Trafficking in a Large Commercial Quantity of Drugs
Introduction
This Sentencing Snapshot describes sentencing outcomes[1] for the offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs in the County and Supreme Courts of Victoria from 2012–13 to 2016–17.[2] Adjustments made by the Court of Appeal to sentence or conviction as at June 2017 have been incorporated into the data in this Snapshot.[3]
Detailed data on trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs and other offences is available on Sentencing Advisory Council Statistics (SACStat).
The Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) provides for a set of trafficking offences that distinguishes between large commercial, commercial and less than commercial quantities of illicit drugs.[4]
A person who prepares, manufactures, sells, exchanges, agrees to sell, offers for sale, or has in his or her possession for sale a drug of dependence without being authorised or licensed to do so is guilty of trafficking in a drug of dependence.[5] The maximum penalties that apply vary depending on the nature and quantity of the drug involved, as well as the age of the recipient of the drugs, with higher maximum penalties for supplying to persons aged under 18 years.[6]
This report examines the offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of a drug (or drugs) of dependence to an adult.[7] The amount of the drug that constitutes a large commercial quantity depends on the type of drug involved.[8] Different types of drugs can be combined in order to achieve a large commercial quantity.[9]
Trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs is an indictable offence that carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment and/or a fine of up to 5,000 penalty units.[10] Indictable offences are more serious offences triable before a judge and jury in the County or Supreme Court. Trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs is a Category 1 offence, which means that a court must impose a custodial sentence for that offence.[11] Sentence lengths for some offences, including trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs, committed after the five years covered by this Snapshot is subject to further restrictions.[12]
Trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs was the principal offence[13] in 0.7% of cases sentenced in the higher courts between 2012–13 and 2016–17.
People Sentenced
From 2012–13 to 2016–17, 67 people were sentenced in the higher courts for a principal offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs.
Figure 1 shows the number of people sentenced for the principal offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs by financial year. There were 10 people sentenced for this offence in 2016–17, down by 15 people from the previous year. The number of people sentenced was highest in 2015–16 (25 people) and lowest in 2013–14 (5 people).
Figure 1: The number of people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs by financial year, 2012–13 to 2016–17
| Financial Year | Total |
|---|---|
| 2012-13 | 15 |
| 2013-14 | 5 |
| 2014-15 | 12 |
| 2015-16 | 25 |
| 2016-17 | 10 |
| Total | 67 |
Sentence Types and Trends
Figure 2 shows the total number of people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs and the number receiving an immediate custodial sentence. An immediate custodial sentence is one that involves at least some element of immediate imprisonment or detention.[14] Over the five-year period, all of the people were given an immediate custodial sentence.
Figure 2: The number of people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs and the number receiving an immediate custodial sentence, 2012–13 to 2016–17
| Financial Year | Custodial sentence | Non-custodial | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| 2013-14 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| 2014-15 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| 2015-16 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| 2016-17 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Total | 67 | 0 | 67 |
Table 1 shows the number of people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs from 2012–13 to 2016–17 by the type of sentence imposed.
Over the five-year period, all of the people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs received a principal sentence of imprisonment (67 people). The principal sentence is the sentence imposed for the charge that is the principal offence.[15] This included 66 people who received a sentence of imprisonment, and one person who received an aggregate sentence of imprisonment.
Table 1: The number and percentage of people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs by sentence type, 2012–13 to 2016–17 (in descending order of numbers for 2016–17)
| Sentence type | 2012–13 | 2013–14 | 2014–15 | 2015–16 | 2016–17 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imprisonment | 15 (100%) | 5 (100%) | 11 (92%) | 25 (100%) | 10 (100%) | 66 (99%) |
| Aggregate imprisonment | 0 (–) | 0 (–) | 1 (8%) | 0 (–) | 0 (–) | 1 (1%) |
| People sentenced | 15 | 5 | 12 | 25 | 10 | 67 |
Age and Gender of People Sentenced
Data on the age and gender of people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs is available on SACStat.
Sentence Length
Two methods for describing sentence lengths are examined in this section. One relates to the principal sentence and examines sentences for the offence at a charge level. The other relates to the total effective sentence and examines sentences for the offence at a case level (the principal sentence is described above).
The total effective sentence in a case with a single charge is the principal sentence. The total effective sentence in a case with multiple charges is the sentence that results from the court ordering the individual sentences for each charge to be served concurrently (at the same time) or wholly or partially cumulatively (one after the other).
Where a case involves multiple charges, the total effective sentence imposed on a person is often longer than the principal sentence. Principal sentences for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs must be considered in this broader context. The following sections analyse the use of imprisonment for the offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs from 2012–13 to 2016–17.
Principal Sentence of Imprisonment
Of the 67 people who received a principal sentence of imprisonment for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs, 66 people received a non-aggregate term of imprisonment.
Figure 3 shows the length of imprisonment for the people receiving a non-aggregate term.[16] Imprisonment terms ranged from 3 years to 20 years, while the median length of imprisonment was 7 years (meaning that half of the imprisonment terms were shorter than 7 years and half were longer).
The most common length of imprisonment imposed was 7 to less than 8 years (13 people).
Figure 3: The number of people sentenced to imprisonment for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs by length of imprisonment term, 2012–13 to 2016–17
| Imprisonment length | Number of people |
|---|---|
| 3 to less than 4 years | 1 |
| 4 to less than 5 years | 5 |
| 5 to less than 6 years | 11 |
| 6 to less than 7 years | 10 |
| 7 to less than 8 years | 13 |
| 8 to less than 9 years | 8 |
| 9 to less than 10 years | 2 |
| 10 to less than 11 years | 1 |
| 11 to less than 12 years | 4 |
| 12 to less than 13 years | 4 |
| 13 to less than 14 years | 2 |
| 14 to less than 15 years | 0 |
| 15 to less than 16 years | 2 |
| 16 to less than 17 years | 0 |
| 17 to less than 18 years | 0 |
| 18 to less than 19 years | 2 |
| 19 to less than 20 years | 0 |
| 20 to less than 21 years | 1 |
| People sentenced | 66 |
As shown in Figure 4, the average (mean) length of imprisonment imposed on people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs ranged from 6 years and 10 months in 2016–17 to 8 years and 6 months in 2013–14.
Figure 4: The average (mean) length of imprisonment imposed on people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs, 2012–13 to 2016–17
| Financial Year | Number of people | Average length of imprisonment term |
|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | 15 | 8 years and 4 months |
| 2013-14 | 5 | 8 years and 6 months |
| 2014-15 | 11 | 8 years and 3 months |
| 2015-16 | 25 | 8 years and 4 months |
| 2016-17 | 10 | 6 years and 10 months |
Other Offences Finalised at the Same Hearing
Often people prosecuted for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs face multiple charges, which are finalised at the same hearing. This section looks at the range of offences for which offenders have been sentenced at the same time as being sentenced for the principal offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs. This section includes data on all people sentenced for a principal offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs, not just those who received imprisonment.
Figure 5 shows the number of people sentenced for the principal offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs by the total number of offences for which sentences were imposed. The number of sentenced offences per person ranged from 1 to 28, while the median was 2 offences. There were 25 people (37.3%) sentenced for the single offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs. The average number of offences per person sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs was 3.75.
Figure 5: The number of people sentenced for the principal offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs by the number of sentenced offences per person, 2012–13 to 2016–17
| Number of offences | Number of people |
|---|---|
| 1 | 25 |
| 2 | 11 |
| 3 | 6 |
| 4 | 6 |
| 5 to 9 | 15 |
| 10 to 19 | 3 |
| 20 or more | 1 |
Table 2 shows the 10 most common offences for people sentenced for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs, by number and percentage. The last column sets out the average number of offences sentenced per person. For example, 20 of the total 67 people (29.9%) also received sentences for possessing a drug of dependence. On average, they were sentenced for 1.60 counts of possessing a drug of dependence.
Table 2: The number and percentage of people sentenced for the principal offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs by the most common offences that were sentenced and the average number of those offences that were sentenced, 2012–13 to 2016–17
| Offence | Number of cases | Percentage of cases | Average number of proven offences per case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Trafficking in a large commercial quantity of a drug of dependence | 67 | 100.0 | 1.03 |
| 2. Possess a drug of dependence | 20 | 29.9 | 1.60 |
| 3. Trafficking in a non-commercial quantity of a drug of dependence | 17 | 25.4 | 1.65 |
| 4. Deal with property suspected of being proceeds of crime | 11 | 16.4 | 1.27 |
| 5. Knowingly deal with proceeds of crime | 7 | 10.4 | 1.00 |
| 6. Possess cartridge ammunition without licence | 6 | 9.0 | 1.00 |
| 7. Possess, carry or use an unregistered general category handgun | 6 | 9.0 | 1.00 |
| 8. Possess precursor chemicals for drugs of dependence | 5 | 7.5 | 1.80 |
| 9. Trafficking in a commercial quantity of a drug of dependence | 5 | 7.5 | 1.00 |
| 10. Theft | 4 | 6.0 | 1.75 |
| People sentenced | 67 | 100.0 | 3.75 |
Total Effective Imprisonment Terms
Figure 6 shows the number of people sentenced to imprisonment for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs from 2012–13 to 2016–17 by length of total effective imprisonment term. The total effective imprisonment terms ranged from 3 years and 2 months to 30 years, while the median total effective imprisonment term was 8 years (meaning that half of the total effective imprisonment terms were below 8 years and half were above).
The most common total effective imprisonment term was 7 to less than 8 years (15 people).
Figure 6: The number of people sentenced to imprisonment for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs by length of total effective imprisonment term, 2012–13 to 2016–17
| Total effective imprisonment length | Number of people |
|---|---|
| 3 to less than 4 years | 1 |
| 4 to less than 5 years | 5 |
| 5 to less than 6 years | 5 |
| 6 to less than 7 years | 7 |
| 7 to less than 8 years | 15 |
| 8 to less than 9 years | 10 |
| 9 to less than 10 years | 5 |
| 10 to less than 11 years | 3 |
| 11 to less than 12 years | 2 |
| 12 to less than 13 years | 4 |
| 13 to less than 14 years | 2 |
| 14 to less than 15 years | 1 |
| 15 to less than 16 years | 3 |
| 16 to less than 17 years | 1 |
| 17 to less than 18 years | 0 |
| 18 to less than 19 years | 2 |
| 19 to less than 20 years | 0 |
| 20 to less than 21 years | 0 |
| 21 to less than 22 years | 0 |
| 22 to less than 23 years | 0 |
| 23 to less than 24 years | 0 |
| 24 to less than 25 years | 0 |
| 25 to less than 26 years | 0 |
| 26 to less than 27 years | 0 |
| 27 to less than 28 years | 0 |
| 28 to less than 29 years | 0 |
| 29 to less than 30 years | 0 |
| 30 years or more | 1 |
| Total people | 67 |
Non-Parole Period
If a person is sentenced to a term of immediate imprisonment of less than one year, the court cannot impose a non-parole period. For terms between 1 year and less than 2 years, the court has the discretion to fix a non-parole period. For terms of imprisonment of 2 years or more, the court must impose a non-parole period in most circumstances. Where a non-parole period is fixed, the person must serve that period before becoming eligible for parole. Where no non-parole period is set by the court, the person must serve the entirety of the imprisonment term in custody.
All of the 67 people who were sentenced to imprisonment for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs were eligible to have a non-parole period fixed. Of these people, 65 were given a non-parole period (97%).[17] Figure 7 shows the number of people sentenced to imprisonment for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs from 2012–13 to 2016–17 by length of non-parole period. Non-parole periods ranged from 1 year and 9 months to 13 years, while the median length of the non-parole period was 5 years (meaning that half of the non-parole periods were below 5 years and half were above).
The most common non-parole period imposed was 5 to less than 6 years (14 people).
Figure 7: The number of people sentenced to imprisonment for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs by length of non-parole period, 2012–13 to 2016–17
| Non-parole period | Number of people |
|---|---|
| 1 to less than 2 years | 1 |
| 2 to less than 3 years | 6 |
| 3 to less than 4 years | 8 |
| 4 to less than 5 years | 11 |
| 5 to less than 6 years | 14 |
| 6 to less than 7 years | 6 |
| 7 to less than 8 years | 4 |
| 8 to less than 9 years | 6 |
| 9 to less than 10 years | 2 |
| 10 to less than 11 years | 3 |
| 11 to less than 12 years | 0 |
| 12 to less than 13 years | 2 |
| 13 to less than 14 years | 2 |
| Total people | 65 |
Total Effective Sentences of Imprisonment and Non-Parole Periods
Figure 8 compares the average length of total effective sentences of imprisonment with the average length of non-parole periods from 2012–13 to 2016–17.
From 2012–13 to 2016–17, the average length of total effective sentences for all people ranged from 8 years and 3 months in 2016–17 to 9 years and 5 months in 2012–13. Over the same period, the average length of non-parole periods ranged from 5 years and 3 months in 2012–13 and 2016–17 to 6 years and 3 months in 2014–15.
Figure 8: The average total effective sentence and the average non-parole period imposed on people sentenced to imprisonment for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs, 2012–13 to 2016–17
| Financial Year | Average total effective length | Average non-parole period |
|---|---|---|
| 2012-13 | 9 years and 5 months | 5 years and 3 months |
| 2013-14 | 8 years and 10 months | 6 years and 2 months |
| 2014-15 | 9 years and 0 months | 6 years and 3 months |
| 2015-16 | 8 years and 10 months | 5 years and 10 months |
| 2016-17 | 8 years and 3 months | 5 years and 3 months |
Further data on total effective sentences of imprisonment and corresponding non-parole periods for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs is available on SACStat.
Summary
From 2012–13 to 2016–17, 67 people were sentenced in the higher courts for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs. All of the 67 people (100%) were given a principal sentence of imprisonment.
The number and range of offences for which people with a principal offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs were sentenced help explain why imprisonment sentence lengths were longer for the total effective sentence than for the principal sentence. The median total effective imprisonment length was 8 years, while the median principal imprisonment length was 7 years.
Total effective imprisonment lengths ranged from 3 years and 2 months to 30 years, and non-parole periods (where imposed) ranged from 1 year and 9 months to 13 years.
Endnotes
1. This series of reports includes custodial and non-custodial supervision orders imposed under Part 5 of the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997 (Vic) as sentencing orders and in the count of people sentenced. These orders are not sentencing orders, as they are imposed in cases where the accused is found to be unfit to stand trial or not guilty because of mental impairment. However, they are included in this report as they are an important form of disposition of criminal charges.
This Sentencing Snapshot is an update of Sentencing Snapshot no. 195, which describes sentencing trends for trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs between 2010–11 and 2014–15.
2. Data on first instance sentence outcomes presented in this Snapshot was obtained from the Strategic Analysis and Review Team at Court Services Victoria. Data on appeal outcomes was collected by the Sentencing Advisory Council from the Australasian Legal Information Institute, and was also provided by the Victorian Court of Appeal. The Sentencing Advisory Council regularly undertakes extensive quality control measures for current and historical data. While every effort is made to ensure that the data analysed in this report is accurate, the data is subject to revision.
3. In October 2017 the High Court delivered its judgment in Director of Public Prosecutions v Dalgliesh (A Pseudonym) [2017] HCA 41, in which it made two important findings about sentencing in Victoria. First, Victorian courts had been giving too much weight to current sentencing practices, which are just one of the factors courts are required to take into account when imposing a sentence. Second, where current sentencing practices are shown to be in error (for example, when they fail to adequately reflect community expectations) courts should change their practices immediately, not incrementally.
Although the High Court’s decision occurred after the five-year period of this Snapshot ended, it may result in considerable changes to sentencing patterns for future editions of the Snapshots.
4. Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) ss 71–71AC.
5. Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) s 70.
6. The sentencing database used for this analysis was compiled using conviction returns. Due to incomplete offence information regarding drug trafficking offences on the conviction returns, a further classification exercise was undertaken to determine the specific offence types. This involved reading the sentencing remarks of the particular cases and determining if the quantity of the drug was non-commercial, commercial or large commercial. In total, there were 576 cases that had drug trafficking (section 71, 71AA, 71AB or 71AC of the Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic)) as the principal offence over the five-year period from 2012–13 to 2016–17. Sentencing remarks were located for 547 cases (95%). The drug quantities for all these cases were checked and coded into the appropriate category. The remaining cases had sentences that were all within the statutory maximum penalty for the offence and were therefore assumed to have been recorded correctly in the first instance.
7. Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) s 71.
8. Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) s 70.
9. See ‘aggregate large commercial quantity’: Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 (Vic) s 70.
10. The value of a penalty unit changes each year and can be found in the Victorian Government Gazette and on the Victorian Legislation and Parliamentary Documents website.
11. Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) s 5(2G).
12. Under section 5(2)(ab) of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) a court must take into account the standard sentence when sentencing certain offences, including trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs, if the offence was committed on or after 1 February 2018.
13. If a person is sentenced for a case with a single charge, the offence for that charge is the principal offence. If a person is sentenced for more than one charge in a single case, the principal offence is the offence for the charge that attracted the most serious sentence according to the sentencing hierarchy.
14. An immediate custodial sentence includes imprisonment and aggregate imprisonment.
15. Refer to endnote 13.
16. Data presented in this section does not include imprisonment lengths for people who received an aggregate sentence of imprisonment. Sentence lengths for aggregate sentences of imprisonment apply to the whole case, while Figure 3 only deals with sentences of imprisonment for the principal offence of trafficking in a large commercial quantity of drugs. From 2012–13 to 2016–17, 1 person received an aggregate form of imprisonment.
17. Two people were not given a non-parole period relating to that case alone, but a non-parole period that also related to other cases. It is not possible to determine the length of the non-parole period that relates to these cases. The non-parole periods for these people are excluded from the analysis.
