Sentencing Snapshot 289: Sentencing Trends for Recklessly Causing Serious Injury in the Higher Courts of Victoria 2018-19 to 2022-23

Date of Publication

Sentencing Snapshot no. 289 describes sentencing outcomes for the offence of recklessly causing serious injury in the County and Supreme Courts of Victoria from 2018-19 to 2022-23.

This is the most recent Snapshot for this offence.

You can access case summaries for recklessly causing serious injury from the Judicial College of Victoria’s Sentencing Manual Case Summaries.

You can also access statistics for recklessly causing serious injury on SACStat.

Authored and published by the Sentencing Advisory Council
© State of Victoria, Sentencing Advisory Council, 2024


Snapshot 289: Recklessly Causing Serious Injury

Introduction

This Sentencing Snapshot describes sentencing outcomes[1] for the offence of recklessly causing serious injury in the County and Supreme Courts of Victoria (the higher courts) from 2018-19 to 2022-23.[2] Adjustments made by the Court of Appeal to sentence or conviction as at June 2023 have been incorporated into the data in this Snapshot.

Detailed data on recklessly causing serious injury and other offences is also available on SACStat.

A person who recklessly causes serious injury to another person without lawful excuse is guilty of this offence. Recklessly causing serious injury is an indictable offence that carries a maximum penalty of 15 years' imprisonment and/or a fine of 1,800 penalty units.[3] It can be tried summarily in the Magistrates' Court if certain criteria are met.[4]

If the offence was committed on or after 28 October 2018 and the victim was on duty as an emergency worker, custodial officer or youth justice worker, it is a category 1 offence, meaning courts must almost always impose a custodial sentence.[5]

This Snapshot focuses on cases where recklessly causing serious injury was the principal offence, that is, cases where recklessly causing serious injury was the offence that received the most severe sentence.[6]

Recklessly causing serious injury was the principal offence in 2.1% of cases sentenced in the higher courts between 2018-19 and 2022-23.

Effect of COVID-19 on sentencing data

The data in this Snapshot is likely to have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic particularly in the 2020-21 and 2021-22 financial years. For instance:

  • the number of people sentenced in the period after March 2020 may be lower than in other years because the pandemic caused delays in court proceedings
  • court backlogs may have led to prioritisation of more serious cases in that period and therefore higher imprisonment rates than in other years
  • prison sentences may be shorter during that period than in other years to reflect the combined effect of:
    1. guilty pleas having an 'augmented mitigatory effect' (Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169) because they help to relieve the strain on the justice system and
    2. the experience of prison being more burdensome due to increased stress on prisoners and their families and changes in custodial conditions.

People sentenced

From 2018-19 to 2022-23, 179 people were sentenced in the higher courts for a principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury.

Figure 1 shows the number of people sentenced for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury by financial year. There were 50 people sentenced for this offence in 2022-23, up from 38 in the previous year. The number of people sentenced was highest in 2022-23 (50 people) and lowest in 2020-21 (29 people).

There were also 2 people who received a custodial supervision order and 3 people who received a non-custodial supervision order for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury during the five-year period. They are not included elsewhere in this Snapshot.[7]

Figure 1: The number of people sentenced for recklessly causing serious injury, by financial year

Financial YearNumber
2018-1930
2019-2032
2020-2129
2021-2238
2022-2350
Total179

Sentence types and trends

Figure 2 shows the proportion of people who received an immediate custodial sentence or non-custodial sentence for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury. An immediate custodial sentence involves at least some element of immediate imprisonment or detention.[8] The rate of immediate custodial sentences was lowest in 2019-20 (84.4%) and highest in 2018-19 (93.3%). Over the five-year period, 88.3% of people were given an immediate custodial sentence.

Figure 2: The percentage of people who received an immediate custodial sentence or non-custodial sentence for recklessly causing serious injury, by financial year

Financial YearImmediate custodial sentenceNon-custodial sentence
2018-1993.3%6.7%
2019-2084.4%15.6%
2020-2193.1%6.9%
2021-2286.8%13.2%
2022-2386.0%14.0%

Table 1 shows the principal sentence types imposed for recklessly causing serious injury from 2018-19 to 2022-23. The principal sentence is the most serious sentence imposed for the charge that is the principal offence.[9]

Over the five-year period, most people sentenced for recklessly causing serious injury received a principal sentence of imprisonment (84.9% or 152 of 179 people). The remaining people received a community correction order (10.6% or 19 people), a youth justice centre order (3.4% or 6 people), a wholly suspended sentence (0.6% or 1 person) and an adjourned undertaking (0.6% or 1 person).[10]

Table 1: The number and percentage of people sentenced for recklessly causing serious injury, by most serious principal sentence type, standard sentence classification and financial year

Sentence type2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-23Total
Imprisonment27 (90.0%)26 (81.3%)27 (93.1%)29 (76.3%)43 (86.0%)152 (84.9%)
Community correction order2 (6.7%)5 (15.6%)1 (3.4%)5 (13.2%)6 (12.0%)19 (10.6%)
Youth justice centre order1 (3.3%)1 (3.1%)0 (0.0%)4 (10.5%)0 (0.0%)6 (3.4%)
Wholly suspended sentence0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (2.0%)1 (0.6%)
Adjourned undertaking0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (3.4%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.6%)
Total3032293850179

Principal and total effective sentences of imprisonment

The following sections analyse the use of imprisonment for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury from 2018-19 to 2022-23.

The principal sentence describes the sentences for the offence at a charge level.

The total effective sentence is the sentence imposed for all charges in a case and applies at a case level. Where a case involves multiple charges, the total effective sentence will be either the same as or longer than the principal sentence.

Principal sentences of imprisonment

There were 152 principal sentences of imprisonment for recklessly causing serious injury. Table 2 shows that 141 (92.8%) were non-aggregate imprisonment terms, and 11 were aggregate imprisonment terms.[11] There were 33 people who received a community correction order in addition to their imprisonment term.

Table 2: The number and percentage of people sentenced to imprisonment for recklessly causing serious injury, by sentence type and financial year

Imprisonment type2018-192019-202020-212021-222022-23Total
Imprisonment20 (87.0%)19 (82.6%)22 (81.5%)24 (82.8%)31 (79.5%)116 (82.3%)
Imprisonment and community correction order3 (13.0%)4 (17.4%)5 (18.5%)5 (17.2%)8 (20.5%)25 (17.7%)
Total non-aggregate imprisonment23 (85.2%)23 (88.5%)27 (100.0%)29 (100.0%)39 (90.7%)141 (92.8%)
Aggregate imprisonment1 (25.0%)1 (33.3%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (25.0%)3 (27.3%)
Aggregate imprisonment and community correction order3 (75.0%)2 (66.7%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)3 (75.0%)8 (72.7%)
Total aggregate imprisonment4 (14.8%)3 (11.5%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)4 (9.3%)11 (7.2%)
Total people sentenced to imprisonment2726272943152

Figure 3 shows the imprisonment lengths for the 141 non-aggregate imprisonment terms for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury. Imprisonment lengths ranged from 42 days to 8 years,[12] while the median imprisonment length was 3 years and 6 months.

The most common range of imprisonment lengths was 3 to less than 4 years (25 principal sentences).

Figure 3: The number of principal sentences of imprisonment for recklessly causing serious injury, by range of imprisonment lengths, 2018-19 to 2022-23

Imprisonment lengthNumber
Less than 1 year16
1 to less than 2 years14
2 to less than 3 years21
3 to less than 4 years25
4 to less than 5 years24
5 to less than 6 years23
6 to less than 7 years11
7 to less than 8 years6
8 to less than 9 years1
Total141

Figure 4 shows the average length of the 141 non-aggregate imprisonment terms for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury each financial year. The average imprisonment length decreased from 3 years and 11 months in 2018-19 to 3 years and 1 month in 2022-23. Over the five-year period, the average imprisonment length for recklessly causing serious injury was 3 years and 6 months.

Figure 4: The average imprisonment length imposed for recklessly causing serious injury, by financial year

Financial yearNumber of peopleAverage imprisonment length
2018-19233 years and 11 months
2019-20233 years and 8 months
2020-21273 years and 7 months
2021-22293 years and 8 months
2022-23393 years and 1 month

Total effective sentences of imprisonment

Figure 5 shows the lengths of total effective sentences of imprisonment in cases where recklessly causing serious injury was the principal offence. Total effective sentences ranged from 42 days to 9 years,[13] while the median total effective sentence was 3 years and 9 months.

The most common range of total effective sentences was 5 to less than 6 years (27 cases).

Figure 5: The number of people sentenced to imprisonment for recklessly causing serious injury, by range of total effective sentences, 2018-19 to 2022-23

Total effective sentence lengthNumber
Less than 1 year18
1 to less than 2 years20
2 to less than 3 years16
3 to less than 4 years24
4 to less than 5 years17
5 to less than 6 years27
6 to less than 7 years14
7 to less than 8 years9
8 to less than 9 years6
9 to less than 10 years1
Total152

Non-parole periods

If a person is sentenced to an imprisonment term of less than 1 year, the court cannot impose a non-parole period. For imprisonment terms between 1 year and less than 2 years, the court has the discretion to fix a non-parole period. For imprisonment terms of 2 years or more, the court must impose a non-parole period in most circumstances. If the court fixes a non-parole period, the person must serve that period before becoming eligible for parole. If the court does not set a non-parole period, the person must serve the entirety of their imprisonment term in custody.

Of the 152 people who were sentenced to imprisonment for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury, 134 were eligible to have a non-parole period fixed.[14] Of those, 114 people were given a non-parole period (85.1%).[15] It was not possible to determine the non-parole period for 1 of those people.[16]

Figure 6 shows the lengths of 113 non-parole periods for people sentenced to imprisonment for recklessly causing serious injury. Non-parole periods ranged from 10 months to 5 years and 8 months, while the median non-parole period was 3 years.

The most common range of non-parole periods was 3 to less than 4 years (33 cases).

Figure 6: The number of people sentenced to imprisonment for recklessly causing serious injury, by range of non-parole periods, 2018-19 to 2022-23

Non-parole periodNumber
Less than 1 year2
1 to less than 2 years24
2 to less than 3 years27
3 to less than 4 years33
4 to less than 5 years11
5 to less than 6 years16
Undetermined1
No non-parole period38
Total152

Average total effective sentences of imprisonment and non-parole periods

Figure 7 represents the average total effective sentences and average non-parole periods each year for the 113 people who were sentenced to imprisonment for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury and who received a non-parole period that could be determined.

The average total effective sentence was relatively consistent during the five-year period, ranging from 4 years and 6 months in 2022-23 to 4 years and 10 months in 2020-21 and 2021-22. Similarly, the average non-parole period was also quite stable, ranging from 2 years and 9 months in 2022-23 to 3 years and 3 months in 2021-22.

Figure 7: The average total effective sentence and non-parole period for people sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period for recklessly causing serious injury, by financial year

Financial yearNumberAverage total effective sentenceAverage non-parole period
2018-19214 years and 9 months3 years and 0 months
2019-20194 years and 8 months3 years and 0 months
2020-21204 years and 10 months3 years and 0 months
2021-22234 years and 10 months3 years and 3 months
2022-23304 years and 6 months2 years and 9 months

Other offences finalised at the same hearing

Sometimes people prosecuted for recklessly causing serious injury face multiple charges, which are finalised at the same hearing. This section looks at the range of offences that offenders were sentenced for alongside the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury.

Figure 8 shows the number of people sentenced for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury by the total number of sentenced offences per person. The number of sentenced offences per person ranged from 1 to 18, and the median was 2 offences. There were 70 people (39.1%) sentenced for the single offence of recklessly causing serious injury. The average number of offences per person was 3.1.

Figure 8: The number of people sentenced for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury, by the number of sentenced offences per person, 2018-19 to 2022-23

Number of offencesNumber
170
232
326
418
5-925
10+8
20+0
Total179

Table 3 shows the 10 most common offences co-sentenced alongside recklessly causing serious injury. The last column sets out the average number of offences sentenced per person. For example, 19 of the total 179 people (10.6%) were also sentenced for theft. On average, those 19 people were sentenced for 1.9 charges of theft per case.

Table 3: The number and percentage of people sentenced for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury, by the most common offences that were sentenced alongside recklessly causing serious injury, 2018-19 to 2022-23

OffenceNumber of casesPercentage of casesAverage number of proven offences per case
Recklessly causing serious injury179100.0%1.0
Commit an indictable offence while on bail2715.1%1.1
Possess a drug of dependence2212.3%1.2
Theft1910.6%1.9
Recklessly causing injury1810.1%1.4
Intentionally destroy or damage property179.5%1.1
Common law assault158.4%1.3
Intentionally causing injury105.6%1.0
Unlicensed driving105.6%1.0
Aggravated burglary95.0%1.0
Total179100.0%3.1

Summary

From 2018-19 to 2022-23, 179 people were sentenced in the higher courts for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury. Of those 179 people, 152 (84.9%) received a principal sentence of imprisonment.

Total effective sentences of imprisonment ranged from 42 days to 9 years, and non-parole periods ranged from 10 month to 5 years and 8 months. The median total effective sentence was 3 years and 9 months, while the median non-parole period was 3 years.

On average, people sentenced for the principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury were sentenced for 3.1 offences each, with a maximum of 18 offences.

Further data on recklessly causing serious injury is available on SACStat.

Endnotes

1. This Sentencing Snapshot is an update of Sentencing Snapshot no. 264, which describes sentencing trends for recklessly causing serious injury between 2016 17 and 2020-21.

2. Data on first-instance sentencing outcomes presented in this Snapshot was obtained from the Strategic Analysis and Review Team at Court Services Victoria. Data on appeal outcomes was collected by the Sentencing Advisory Council from the Australasian Legal Information Institute and was also provided by the Victorian Court of Appeal. The Sentencing Advisory Council regularly undertakes extensive quality control measures for current and historical data. While every effort is made to ensure that the data analysed in this Snapshot is accurate, the data is subject to revision.

3. Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 17. The value of a penalty unit changes each year and can be found on the Council's website.

4. Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic) s 28, sch 2 cl 4.1.

5. Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) ss 3(ca) (definition of category 1 offence), 5(2G). If the court finds that a special reason exists under section 10A, the court may alternatively impose a mandatory treatment and monitoring order: Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) s 5(2GA).

6. If a person is sentenced for a case with a single charge, that offence is the principal offence. If a person is sentenced for more than one charge in a single case, the principal offence is the offence that attracted the most serious sentence according to the sentencing hierarchy.

7. Custodial and non-custodial supervision orders are not sentencing orders as they are imposed in cases in which the accused is found unfit to stand trial or not guilty because of mental impairment. However, they are mentioned in this Snapshot as they are an important form of disposition of criminal charges.

8. Immediate custodial sentences are mostly imprisonment, but they can also include partially suspended sentences, youth justice centre orders, hospital security orders, residential treatment orders, and combined custody and treatment orders.

9. For example, if the principal offence receives a combined order of imprisonment and a community correction order pursuant to section 44 of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), imprisonment is recorded as the principal sentence.

10. The adjourned undertaking was imposed in DPP v Bandi [2021] VCC 172.

11. A court may impose an aggregate sentence of imprisonment on multiple charges sentenced at the same time. These sentences are a single imprisonment term, but the sentences imposed on individual charges are not specified. A case may include a combination of aggregate and non-aggregate sentences.

12. Sentencing remarks are not publicly available for the case in which a principal offence of recklessly causing serious injury received 8 years' imprisonment.

13. Sentencing remarks are not publicly available for the case in which a total effective sentence of 9 years' imprisonment was imposed. The second-longest total effective sentence was 8 years and 8 months' imprisonment: DPP v Gilbert & Anor [2021] VCC 298.

14. 18 people were not eligible to have a non-parole period fixed because they were given a total effective sentence of less than 1 year.

15. 20 people were eligible to have a non-parole period fixed but did not receive one. This included 17 people who had an imprisonment length between 1 year and less than 2 years, and 3 people who had an imprisonment length of 2 years or more.

16. 1 person was given a non-parole period that related to more than 1 case (for example, they may have already been serving a prison sentence at the time). It was not possible to separately determine the non-parole periods that related to each individual case.