Sentencing Snapshot no. 285 describes sentencing outcomes for the offence of armed robbery in the County and Supreme Courts of Victoria from 2018-19 to 2022-23.
This is the most recent Snapshot for this offence.
You can access case summaries for armed robbery from the Judicial College of Victoria’s Sentencing Manual Case Summaries.
You can also access statistics for armed robbery on SACStat.
Authored and published by the Sentencing Advisory Council
© State of Victoria, Sentencing Advisory Council, 2024
Snapshot 285: Armed Robbery
Introduction
This Sentencing Snapshot describes sentencing outcomes[1] for the offence of armed robbery in the County and Supreme Courts of Victoria (the higher courts) from 2018-19 to 2022-23.[2] Adjustments made by the Court of Appeal to sentence or conviction as at June 2023 have been incorporated into the data in this Snapshot.
Detailed data on armed robbery and other offences is also available on SACStat.
A person who uses or threatens to use force in order to steal and at the time has with them a firearm, imitation firearm, offensive weapon, explosive or imitation explosive is guilty of the offence of armed robbery. Armed robbery is an indictable offence that carries a maximum penalty of 25 years' imprisonment and/or a fine of 3,000 penalty units.[3]
Armed robbery is a category 2 offence if it was committed on or after 28 October 2018 and the offender had a firearm with them at the time of the offence, or the victim suffered an injury as a direct result of the offence, or the offence was committed in company with others. Courts must impose custodial sentences for category 2 offences except in particular circumstances.[4]
This Snapshot focuses on cases where armed robbery was the principal offence, that is, cases where armed robbery was the offence that received the most severe sentence.[5]
Armed robbery was the principal offence in 7.2% of cases sentenced in the higher courts between 2018-19 and 2022-23.
Effect of COVID-19 on sentencing data
The data in this Snapshot is likely to have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic particularly in the 2020-21 and 2021-22 financial years. For instance:
- the number of people sentenced in the period after March 2020 may be lower than in other years because the pandemic caused delays in court proceedings
- court backlogs may have led to prioritisation of more serious cases in that period and therefore higher imprisonment rates than in other years
- prison sentences may be shorter during that period than in other years to reflect the combined effect of:
- guilty pleas having an 'augmented mitigatory effect' (Worboyes v The Queen [2021] VSCA 169) because they help to relieve the strain on the justice system and
- the experience of prison being more burdensome due to increased stress on prisoners and their families and changes in custodial conditions.
People sentenced
From 2018-19 to 2022-23, 621 people were sentenced in the higher courts for a principal offence of armed robbery.
Figure 1 shows the number of people sentenced for the principal offence of armed robbery by financial year. There were 131 people sentenced for this offence in 2022-23, up from 101 in the previous year. The number of people sentenced was highest in 2018-19 (141 people) and lowest in 2021-22 (101 people).
There was also 1 person who received a non-custodial supervision order for the principal offence of armed robbery (in 2018-19). They are not included in this Snapshot.[6]
Figure 1: The number of people sentenced for armed robbery, by financial year
| Financial Year | Number |
|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 141 |
| 2019-20 | 137 |
| 2020-21 | 111 |
| 2021-22 | 101 |
| 2022-23 | 131 |
| Total | 621 |
Sentence types and trends
Figure 2 shows the proportion of people who received an immediate custodial sentence or non-custodial sentence for the principal offence of armed robbery. An immediate custodial sentence involves at least some element of immediate imprisonment or detention.[7] The rate of immediate custodial sentences was lowest in 2021-22 (79.2%) and highest in 2018-19 (88.7%). Over the five-year period, 85.2% of people were given an immediate custodial sentence.
Figure 2: The percentage of people who received an immediate custodial sentence or non-custodial sentence for armed robbery, by financial year
| Financial Year | Immediate custodial sentence | Non-custodial sentence |
|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 88.7% | 11.3% |
| 2019-20 | 86.1% | 13.9% |
| 2020-21 | 85.6% | 14.4% |
| 2021-22 | 79.2% | 20.8% |
| 2022-23 | 84.7% | 15.3% |
Table 1 shows the principal sentence types imposed for armed robbery from 2018-19 to 2022-23. The principal sentence is the most serious sentence imposed for the principal offence in a case.[8]
Over the five-year period, most people sentenced for armed robbery received a principal sentence of imprisonment (78.9% or 490 of 621 people). The remaining people received a community correction order (12.9% or 80 people), a youth justice centre order (6.3% or 39 people), a drug and alcohol treatment order (1.3% or 8 people), a fine (0.5% or 3 people) and an adjourned undertaking (0.2% or 1 person).
Table 1: The number and percentage of people sentenced for armed robbery, by principal sentence type and financial year
| Sentence type | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 | 2022-23 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imprisonment | 119 (84.4%) | 106 (77.4%) | 85 (76.6%) | 80 (79.2%) | 100 (76.3%) | 490 (78.9%) |
| Community correction order | 16 (11.3%) | 18 (13.1%) | 14 (12.6%) | 15 (14.9%) | 17 (13.0%) | 80 (12.9%) |
| Youth justice centre order | 6 (4.3%) | 12 (8.8%) | 10 (9.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 11 (8.4%) | 39 (6.3%) |
| Drug and alcohol treatment order | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (5.0%) | 3 (2.3%) | 8 (1.3%) |
| Fine | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (1.8%) | 1 (1.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (0.5%) |
| Adjourned undertaking | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (0.2%) |
| Total | 141 | 137 | 111 | 101 | 131 | 621 |
Principal and total effective sentences of imprisonment
The following sections analyse the use of imprisonment for the principal offence of armed robbery from 2018-19 to 2022-23.
The principal sentence describes sentences for the offence at a charge level.
The total effective sentence is the sentence imposed for all charges in a case and applies at a case level. Where a case involves multiple charges, the total effective sentence will be either the same as or longer than the principal sentence.
Principal sentences of imprisonment
There were 490 principal sentences of imprisonment for armed robbery. Table 2 shows that 435 (88.8%) were non-aggregate imprisonment terms, and 55 were aggregate imprisonment terms.[9] There were 146 people who received a community correction order in addition to their imprisonment term.
Table 2: The number and percentage of people sentenced to imprisonment for armed robbery, by sentence type and financial year
| Imprisonment type | 2018-19 | 2019-20 | 2020-21 | 2021-22 | 2022-23 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Imprisonment | 85 (81.7%) | 67 (70.5%) | 55 (71.4%) | 49 (67.1%) | 70 (81.4%) | 326 (74.9%) |
| Imprisonment and community correction order | 19 (18.3%) | 28 (29.5%) | 22 (28.6%) | 24 (32.9%) | 16 (18.6%) | 109 (25.1%) |
| Total non-aggregate imprisonment | 104 (87.4%) | 95 (89.6%) | 77 (90.6%) | 73 (91.3%) | 86 (86.0%) | 435 (88.8%) |
| Aggregate imprisonment | 5 (33.3%) | 3 (27.3%) | 3 (37.5%) | 3 (42.9%) | 4 (28.6%) | 18 (32.7%) |
| Aggregate imprisonment and community correction order | 10 (66.7%) | 8 (72.7%) | 5 (62.5%) | 4 (57.1%) | 10 (71.4%) | 37 (67.3%) |
| Total aggregate imprisonment | 15 (12.6%) | 11 (10.4%) | 8 (9.4%) | 7 (8.8%) | 14 (14.0%) | 55 (11.2%) |
| Total people sentenced to imprisonment | 119 | 106 | 85 | 80 | 100 | 490 |
Figure 3 shows the imprisonment lengths for the 435 non-aggregate imprisonment terms for the principal offence of armed robbery. Imprisonment lengths ranged from 1 day to 12 years,[10] while the median imprisonment length was 2 years and 6 months.
The most common range of imprisonment lengths was 3 to less than 4 years (105 principal sentences).
Figure 3: The number of principal sentences of imprisonment for armed robbery, by range of imprisonment lengths, 2018-19 to 2022-23
| Imprisonment length | Number |
|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 76 |
| 1 to less than 2 years | 77 |
| 2 to less than 3 years | 95 |
| 3 to less than 4 years | 105 |
| 4 to less than 5 years | 51 |
| 5 to less than 6 years | 20 |
| 6 to less than 7 years | 6 |
| 7 to less than 8 years | 1 |
| 8 to less than 9 years | 1 |
| 9 to less than 10 years | 1 |
| 10 to less than 11 years | 1 |
| 11 to less than 12 years | 0 |
| 12 to less than 13 years | 1 |
| Total | 435 |
Figure 4 shows the average length of the 435 non-aggregate imprisonment terms for the principal offence of armed robbery each financial year. The average imprisonment length ranged from 2 years and 3 months (in 2020-21 and 2021-22) to 2 years and 10 months (in 2018-19). Over the five-year period, the average imprisonment length for armed robbery was 2 years and 7 months.
Figure 4: The average imprisonment length imposed for armed robbery, by financial year
| Financial year | Number of people | Average imprisonment length |
|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 104 | 2 years and 10 months |
| 2019-20 | 95 | 2 years and 7 months |
| 2020-21 | 77 | 2 years and 3 months |
| 2021-22 | 73 | 2 years and 3 months |
| 2022-23 | 86 | 2 years and 8 months |
Total effective sentences of imprisonment
Figure 5 shows the lengths of total effective sentences of imprisonment in cases where armed robbery was the principal offence. Total effective sentences ranged from 1 day to 14 years,[11] while the median total effective sentence was 2 years and 10 months.
The most common range of total effective sentences was less than 1 year (101 cases).
Figure 5: The number of people sentenced to imprisonment for armed robbery, by range of total effective sentences, 2018-19 to 2022-23
| Total effective sentence length | Number |
|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 101 |
| 1 to less than 2 years | 82 |
| 2 to less than 3 years | 70 |
| 3 to less than 4 years | 90 |
| 4 to less than 5 years | 68 |
| 5 to less than 6 years | 37 |
| 6 to less than 7 years | 20 |
| 7 to less than 8 years | 13 |
| 8 to less than 9 years | 2 |
| 9 to less than 10 years | 2 |
| 10 to less than 11 years | 2 |
| 11 to less than 12 years | 2 |
| 12 to less than 13 years | 0 |
| 13 to less than 14 years | 0 |
| 14 to less than 15 years | 1 |
| Total | 490 |
Non-parole periods
If a person is sentenced to an imprisonment term of less than 1 year, the court cannot impose a non-parole period. For imprisonment terms between 1 year and less than 2 years, the court has the discretion to fix a non-parole period. For imprisonment terms of 2 years or more, the court must impose a non-parole period in most circumstances. If the court fixes a non-parole period, the person must serve that period before becoming eligible for parole. If the court does not set a non-parole period, the person must serve the entirety of their imprisonment term in custody.
Of the 490 people who were sentenced to imprisonment for the principal offence of armed robbery, 389 were eligible to have a non-parole period fixed.[12] Of these people, 322 were given a non-parole period (82.8%).[13] It was not possible to determine the non-parole period for 3 of those people.[14]
Figure 6 shows the lengths of non-parole periods for people sentenced to imprisonment for armed robbery. Non-parole periods ranged from 1 month to 10 years, while the median non-parole period was 2 years and 2 months.
The most common range of non-parole periods was 2 to less than 3 years (106 people).
Figure 6: The number of people sentenced to imprisonment for armed robbery, by range of non-parole periods, 2018-19 to 2022-23
| Non-parole period | Number |
|---|---|
| Less than 1 year | 15 |
| 1 to less than 2 years | 102 |
| 2 to less than 3 years | 106 |
| 3 to less than 4 years | 54 |
| 4 to less than 5 years | 29 |
| 5 to less than 6 years | 6 |
| 6 to less than 7 years | 1 |
| 7 to less than 8 years | 1 |
| 8 to less than 9 years | 4 |
| 9 to less than 10 years | 0 |
| 10 to less than 11 years | 1 |
| Undetermined | 3 |
| No non-parole period | 168 |
| Total | 490 |
Average total effective sentences of imprisonment and non-parole periods
Figure 7 represents the average total effective sentences and average non-parole periods each year for the 319 people who were sentenced to imprisonment for the principal offence of armed robbery and who received a non-parole period that could be determined.
The average total effective sentence ranged from 3 years and 6 months in 2020-21 to 4 years and 5 months in 2018-19. Over the same period, the average non-parole period ranged from 2 years and 2 months in 2020-21 to 2 years and 8 months in 2018-19 and 2019-20.
Figure 7: The average total effective sentences and non-parole periods for people sentenced to imprisonment with a non-parole period for armed robbery, by financial year
| Financial year | Number | Average total effective sentence | Average non-parole period |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-19 | 85 | 4 years and 5 months | 2 years and 8 months |
| 2019-20 | 64 | 4 years and 4 months | 2 years and 8 months |
| 2020-21 | 54 | 3 years and 6 months | 2 years and 2 months |
| 2021-22 | 47 | 3 years and 8 months | 2 years and 4 months |
| 2022-23 | 69 | 3 years and 10 months | 2 years and 5 months |
Other offences finalised at the same hearing
Sometimes people prosecuted for armed robbery face multiple charges, which are finalised at the same hearing. This section looks at the range of offences that offenders were sentenced for alongside the principal offence of armed robbery.
Figure 8 shows the number of people sentenced for the principal offence of armed robbery by the total number of sentenced offences per person. The number of sentenced offences per person ranged from 1 to 37, and the median was 3 offences. There were 132 people (21.3%) sentenced for the single offence of armed robbery. The average number of offences per person was 4.0.
Figure 8: The number of people sentenced for the principal offence of armed robbery, by the number of sentenced offences per person, 2018-19 to 2022-23
| Number of offences | Number |
|---|---|
| 1 | 132 |
| 2 | 162 |
| 3 | 105 |
| 4 | 56 |
| 5-9 | 120 |
| 10-19 | 37 |
| 20+ | 9 |
| Total | 621 |
Table 3 shows the 10 most common offences co-sentenced alongside armed robbery. The last column sets out the average number of offences sentenced per case. For example, 158 of the total 621 people (25.4%) were also sentenced for theft. On average, those 158 people were sentenced for 2.1 charges of theft per case.
Table 3: The number and percentage of people sentenced for the principal offence of armed robbery, by the most common offences that were sentenced alongside armed robbery, 2018-19 to 2022-23
| Offence | Number of cases | Percentage of cases | Average number of proven offences per case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armed robbery | 621 | 100.0% | 1.3 |
| Commit an indictable offence while on bail | 180 | 29.0% | 1.3 |
| Theft | 158 | 25.4% | 2.1 |
| Possess a drug of dependence | 68 | 11.0% | 1.3 |
| Attempted armed robbery | 45 | 7.2% | 1.5 |
| Intentionally causing injury | 37 | 6.0% | 1.1 |
| Intentionally destroy or damage property | 35 | 5.6% | 1.3 |
| Common law assault | 30 | 4.8% | 1.2 |
| Contravene a conduct condition of bail | 30 | 4.8% | 1.2 |
| Handing stolen goods | 29 | 4.7% | 1.3 |
| Total | 621 | 100.0% | 4.0 |
Summary
From 2018-19 to 2022-23, 621 people were sentenced in the higher courts for the principal offence of armed robbery. Of those 621 people, 490 (78.9%) received a principal sentence of imprisonment.
Total effective sentences of imprisonment ranged from 1 day to 14 years, and non-parole periods ranged from 1 month to 10 years. The median total effective sentence was 2 years and 10 months, while the median non-parole period was 2 years and 2 months.
On average, people sentenced for the principal offence of armed robbery were sentenced for 4.0 offences each, with a maximum of 37 offences.
Further data on armed robbery is available on SACStat.
Endnotes
1. This Sentencing Snapshot is an update of Sentencing Snapshot no. 261, which describes sentencing trends for armed robbery between 2016 17 and 2020-21.
2. Data on first-instance sentencing outcomes presented in this Snapshot was obtained from the Strategic Analysis and Review Team at Court Services Victoria. Data on appeal outcomes was collected by the Sentencing Advisory Council from the Australasian Legal Information Institute and was also provided by the Victorian Court of Appeal. The Sentencing Advisory Council regularly undertakes extensive quality control measures for current and historical data. While every effort is made to ensure that the data analysed in this Snapshot is accurate, the data is subject to revision.
3. Crimes Act 1958 (Vic) s 75(A). The value of a penalty unit changes each year and can be found on the Council's website.
4. Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic) ss 3(da) (definition of category 2 offence), 5(2H) (2I).
5. If a person is sentenced for a case with a single charge, that offence is the principal offence. If a person is sentenced for more than one charge in a single case, the principal offence is the offence that attracted the most serious sentence according to the sentencing hierarchy.
6. Custodial and non-custodial supervision orders are not sentencing orders as they are imposed in cases in which the accused is found unfit to stand trial or not guilty because of mental impairment. However, they are mentioned in this Snapshot as they are an important form of disposition of criminal charges.
7. Immediate custodial sentences are mostly imprisonment, but they can also include partially suspended sentences, youth justice centre orders, hospital security orders, residential treatment orders, and combined custody and treatment orders.
8. For example, if the principal offence receives a combined order of imprisonment and a community correction order pursuant to section 44 of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), imprisonment is recorded as the principal sentence.
9. A court may impose an aggregate sentence of imprisonment on multiple charges sentenced at the same time. These sentences are a single imprisonment term, but the sentences imposed on individual charges are not specified. A case may include a combination of aggregate and non-aggregate sentences.
10. The 12-year sentence was imposed in 2021 for an armed robbery committed in 1994: DPP v Lanciana [2021] VCC 1252.
11. The total effective sentence of 14 years was imposed in DPP v Lanciana [2021] VCC 1252.
12. 101 people were not eligible to have a non-parole period fixed because they were given a total effective sentence of less than 1 year.
13. 67 people were eligible to have a non-parole period fixed but did not receive one. This included 62 people who had an imprisonment length between 1 year and less than 2 years, and 5 people who had an imprisonment length of 2 years or more.
14. 3 people were given a non-parole period that related to more than 1 case (for example, they may have already been serving a prison sentence at the time). It was not possible to separately determine the non-parole periods that related to each individual case.
